Ironworks Gaming Forum

Ironworks Gaming Forum (http://www.ironworksforum.com/forum/index.php)
-   Miscellaneous Games (RPG or not) (http://www.ironworksforum.com/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=27)
-   -   Battle for Middle Earth 2 (http://www.ironworksforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=67079)

Sir Goulum 10-11-2006 02:04 AM

OMG is this game ever addicting. It's AoE: LotR... but better. I'm really impressed by it so far, in the early going.

Bozos of Bones 10-11-2006 04:10 AM

This game is not good. It is bad. Very bad. Once you build your first nuke hero, you will understand.
EDIT: really stupid spelling error.

[ 10-12-2006, 03:42 AM: Message edited by: Bozos of Bones ]

Memnoch 10-12-2006 12:13 AM

You lose track of heroes, don't you?

Bozos of Bones 10-12-2006 03:43 AM

Lose track? No, it's that heroes are the it. Just take a wizard, give him Teleport, a horse, Word of Power, and you got yourself a mobile nuke. Heroes are seriously too powerful, the rest of the units are here just for eye candy, to look good when your hero blows them up.

Iron Greasel 10-12-2006 08:55 AM

Just don't use the trick?

Bozos of Bones 10-12-2006 10:07 AM

Umm... if this were a strictly Single Player game, I'd be kinda OK with not using something..
But this game is an RTS. Primarily for Multiplayer. And it sucks. At one point of the development, the devs must have just said "You know what? Screw balance! Everyone working on balance should from now on work on eye candy!"
In BFME1, the Heroes were the backbone of the army, needed for supporting your troops, countering enemy troops and heroes and just plain being powerful. in BFME2, the heroes ARE your army. They do everything. There's nothing in the game that 4-5 squads of men can do that a single hero can't. It's like Hero of the Rings: Battle for Best Hero.

johnny 10-12-2006 11:09 AM

I expected so much more from this game with the freedom to build where you please and all that, but all in all it was just a big disapointment. I actually liked the first one better.

Sir Goulum 10-12-2006 04:18 PM

I never played the first one... if I like the second this much, I can't imagine what the first one's like.

Bozos of Bones 10-12-2006 06:31 PM

The first one, as bad as it may be, is infinitely superior to the second one. Tactics and strategic placement is much more important, and base-building is simple, which I kinda like because it makes for faster gameplay and more important decisions. Heroes are there to support, and they are important, but the armies are what really matters. It's no Dawn of War(one of the best RTS games I've ever played), but it's much more fun than BFME2.

johnny 10-13-2006 07:46 PM

You forgot to mention that the Rohan cavalry kicks major ass and then some.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.3
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2024 Ironworks Gaming & ©2024 The Great Escape Studios TM - All Rights Reserved