[img]graemlins/jumpclap.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/jumpclap.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/beheaded.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/jumpclap.gif[/img] [img]graemlins/jumpclap.gif[/img]
Here's Your Article and the Spider you asked for [img]graemlins/monster12.gif[/img] http://edition.cnn.com/2004/LAW/03/1....ap/index.html
Now PIKE OFF!!!

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Some of the nation's largest Internet providers, in an unusual joint effort, said Wednesday they filed six lawsuits against hundreds of people who were accused of sending millions of unwanted e-mails in violation of the new U.S. law against "spam."

The legal actions by Microsoft Corp., America Online Inc., Earthlink Inc. and Yahoo! Inc., represent the first major industry actions under the "can spam" legislation that went into effect January 1. The lawsuits, filed in federal courts in California, Georgia, Virginia and Washington state, were announced at a news conference.

The companies said the defendants include some of the nation's most notorious large-scale spammers. The Internet providers -- collectively with tens of millions of subscribers -- said they shared information, resources and investigative information to identify some of the defendants.

"Congress gave us the necessary tools to pursue spammers with stiff penalties, and we in the industry didn't waste a moment moving with speed and resolve to take advantage of the new law," said Randall Boe, AOL's top lawyer and executive vice president. AOL and CNN.com are both owned by Time Warner.

Dozens of those named in the lawsuits, however, were identified only as "John Doe" defendants who were accused of e-mailing unwanted pitches for prescription drugs, herbal potions and weight loss plans.

Among the named defendants were Davis Wolfgang Hawke of Medfield, Massachusetts, whom AOL lawyers said also is known as Dave Bridger, and Braden Bournival of Manchester, New Hampshire. They and others were accused of sending millions of e-mails offering weight loss supplements, handheld devices called "personal lie detectors" and other products.

The "can spam" legislation requires unsolicited e-mails to include a mechanism so recipients could indicate they did not want future mass mailings.

The law also prohibits senders of unsolicited commercial e-mail from disguising their identity by using a false return address or misleading subject line, and it prohibits senders from harvesting addresses off Web sites.

This is simply one of the *best* crackdowns EVER!!! E-Mail Spammers, be afraid!
BE VERY AFRAID!!!

I never trusted "2 unsubscrib, clik hear" links on spam... I always suspected that it would sign me up for MORE SPAM! I don't even open them any more. I delete and, for every letter I get, send my irritated, angry thoughts towards the sender. Imagine what would happen if everyone did that! Come on, people, work with me! For every spam you delete, focus hateful thoughts for five seconds! Maybe our combined willpower can get them to keel over!

Or we could just delete them. I like my way better, though.

OR you could lock these spammers up and melt the key down!