ok, this is really pissing me off, my husband went to court about a week and a half ago over the theft charges, and the DA had no evidence, nothing to prove that he did it, or even that the money was really missing, in other words, no bank statements, no video tape, no deposit slip, no testimony, nothing. but the judge said that he just did not belive my husband was telling the truth, and there for charged him with a class C felony, is it just me, or is that like totally wrong?
my husbands-bosses-wife went and testiied on his behalf, but the judge dismissed her testimony, how is it possible that if there is no evidence, that he was convicted? do they not have to prove that there was an actual thet before he can even be charged in the first place? anyway, I am still mad about it, and would like some thoughts on this, so eel ree to vent your oppinion of the american judical system
[ 09-07-2003, 02:57 PM: Message edited by: Stormymystic ]