Quote:
Originally Posted by Azred
My presumption is that there is no such proof possible because there are too many unknowns to attain conclusive proof.
|
Really? The key presumption of science involves attaining proof of something unknown. So how many unknowns are we looking at here that it would dissuade science from exploring them all?
Or is there some new line of quantum enviromentalism which allows for pollution to both exist and yet simply have no effect, as long as we don't try to observe it, and if we let the cat out of the box.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Azred
The phrase "it could be too late" is Chicken Little thinking--it presumes that whatever happens must by definition be negative. Why is the glass always half empty?
|
If we can never know, it doesn't matter. That presumption is basically the glass is empty.