Looks like the disagreement is not over the amount of money, but rather in what form the money given should take, loans or grants. It looks like the disput is about weither the G7, 7 richest countries in the world are going to give the money to the poor, or loan the money to the poor. If it is given without expectation of repayment would that have a more benifitual(sp?) result on the poor country's economies, or would loaning them the money where they have pay the money back? I don't believe it is wise to loan money to people who are already under a high debt, and expect them to be able to repay. Giving them the money, may not be wise either. Atleast the giver is not expecting any money back and won't have their own economies hurt when the money isn't paid back.
__________________
Crustiest of the OLD COOTS "Donating mirrors for years to help the Liberal/Socialist find their collective rear-ends, because both hands doesn't seem to be working.
Veitnam 61-65:KIA 1864
66:KIA 5008
67:KIA 9378
68:KIA 14594
69:KIA 9414
70:KIA 4221
71:KIA 1380
72:KIA 300
Afghanistan2001-2008 KIA 585
2009-2012 KIA 1465 and counting
Davros 1
Much abliged Massachusetts
|