View Single Post
Old 03-10-2003, 01:53 PM   #40
Spelca
Emerald Dragon
 

Join Date: January 3, 2002
Location: From Slovenia, in Sweden
Age: 43
Posts: 931
What I wanted to point out is that everyone (ahem [img]tongue.gif[/img] ) is saying that Saddam will never disarm. Including representers of the US government that I have spoken to. So my question (if you've read my post) was what was the point of going to the UN if the US was planning to attack Iraq no matter what? You say you don't believe Saddam, but what if Saddam really would disarm, would you believe him then? Probably not, right. [img]smile.gif[/img] You'd say that he's still hiding some weapons somewhere. Soooo... if nobody is ever willing to believe Saddam, what exactly was the point of going through the UN? Can anybody answer me that? [img]smile.gif[/img] If the US had really wanted the oppinion of the UN and wanted to work through the UN, then okay. But right now it seems they'll go to war with the UN or without. So what was the real reason? [img]smile.gif[/img]
__________________
At one time or another there will be a choice: you or the wall. (J. Winterson)
Spelca is offline   Reply With Quote