|
Grendal,
They're not my assumptions - I said that "it's more or less assumed " - I didn't say that *I* assumed. Please read the post before you criticise.
But *IF* Isreal were to attack Iran, *I* would assume that the first attempt would be via conventional weaponry. Having said that, *IF* such a strike occured, the ensuing war would severely threaten Israel's survival.
I would assume that the break-point for Israel would be when the first Iranian soldier sets foot on Israeli soil. At that point, the issue of whether Israel would consider using such weapons is a foregone conclusion. Afterall, no-one owns nuclear weapons just for show.
|