Quote:
Originally Posted by Azred
The presumption you are making here is that conclucsive proof will support human-influenced global warming. My presumption is that there is no such proof possible because there are too many unknowns to attain conclusive proof.
The phrase "it could be too late" is Chicken Little thinking--it presumes that whatever happens must by definition be negative. Why is the glass always half empty?
|
Correct it is also being used only against one side of the arugment.... instead of : if there is no human influnced global warming and we proceed as there is how much damage has been done by the time we find out they were wrong about human influence?????
The biggest problem I have is with the logic used... it isn't applied equaly to both sides. Any one who understands basic Algebra knows what ever you do to one side must also be done to the other side, OR you get a false answer. That logic holds true for math as well as thinking... LOL I know Az Chicken Littlin' isn't thinking it's feelin'
