Spell immunity

[el_kalkylus]

Ok protection from enchantments doesn't protect you from hold monsters cast by demons, neither does it protect you from being stunned by Kua Toa Warriors. It is rather disappointing. I found that at least chaotic command protects against demons hold, but I have found nothing to protect my party from stun, except maybe mirror image.

How do I protect my party from being stunned by Kua Toas so that I leave nothing to chance? They are all so easily affected by magic.

[Dundee Slaytern]

Spell Immunity will only protect you from spells that actually have a school-type. Psionics for example will not be affected by Spell Immunity.

Free Action handles Stun.

[ 12-20-2003, 08:13 AM: Message edited by: Dundee Slaytern ]

[LennonCook]

Originally posted by Dundee Slaytern: Spell Immunity will only protect you from spells that actually have a school-type. Psionics for example will not be affected by Spell Immunity. Free Action handles Stun.

Except that most Illithid spells (other than brainsuck) actually *are* affected by SI:Enchantment... would've thought that they'd be psionics...

[Pirengle]

Originally posted by Dundee Slaytern: Spell Immunity:Evocation will protect you from Cloudkill.

Will it protect from Cloudkill fired from a wand? (Scenario: mage casts Cloudkill from wand, then SI: Evocation, then Tenser's.)

[el_kalkylus]

Originally posted by Pirengle: quote: Originally posted by Dundee Slaytern: Spell Immunity:Evocation will protect you from Cloudkill.

Will it protect from Cloudkill fired from a wand? (Scenario: mage casts Cloudkill from wand, then SI: Evocation, then Tenser's.) [/QUOTE]Sadly no. I just tested it.

Edit: My test was to use the wand of cloudkill myself. I don't know if cloudkill cast by monsters would affect a mage with spell immunity evocation, but it probably wouldn't since Dundee was so sure about this.

[ 12-21-2003, 12:37 PM: Message edited by: el_kalkylus ]