11-11-2001, 10:50 AM | #11 |
Ninja Storm Shadow
Join Date: March 27, 2001
Location: Northport,Alabama, USA
Age: 62
Posts: 3,577
|
quote: I guess it depends on your style of chess Given the fact that proceeding the 11 Sept, 2001 attack Usama and his boys were running their mouths about how they would make the USA howl, and their stated goal is to bring down the great "Satan". Personaly I think Usama is an Idiot, look at what he did, he brought a box cutter to a gun fight. A gun fight with the baddest SOB in the world, then he was not able to really follow up his first thrust with anything more than a jab. And now he has this "I got nukes" threat, after the USA news media has spent weeks talking about what if he gets nukes! Usama is puffing his orginization up, just like a animal that is facing a bigger animal. Usama is a good tacticain (sp?) he struck at our economy while we are in a ression in hopes of bringing us down. He knows that we are in a death fight, the big question is do we?
__________________
Crustiest of the OLD COOTS "Donating mirrors for years to help the Liberal/Socialist find their collective rear-ends, because both hands doesn't seem to be working. Veitnam 61-65:KIA 1864 66:KIA 5008 67:KIA 9378 68:KIA 14594 69:KIA 9414 70:KIA 4221 71:KIA 1380 72:KIA 300 Afghanistan2001-2008 KIA 585 2009-2012 KIA 1465 and counting Davros 1 Much abliged Massachusetts |
11-11-2001, 02:04 PM | #12 |
White Dragon
Join Date: October 19, 2001
Location: York, UK.
Age: 41
Posts: 1,815
|
The point should also be made that it was printed in a Pakistani newspaper. They share a border which ther can't control and he has the most to gain from bringing down there government quickly. So it is possible that this may have been a bit of sensationalism for the front page, just a thought.
It has been said by Yorick before now and I think it applies here - they are just trying to sell papers. This is possibly the one thing that will sell papers by the cart load in Pakistan right now. (OMG! I never thought I would use the word "Yorick" without "I don't agree with..." before it!! I suppose there is a first time for everything...) Please don't take that too seriously Yorick, please...
__________________
[img]\"http://img1.ranchoweb.com/images/sproutman/certwist.gif\" alt=\" - \" /><br /><br /><i>\"And the angels all pallid and wan,<br />Uprising, unveiling, affirm,<br />That the play is the tragedy, man,<br />And its hero the Conquerer Worm.\"</i><br /> - Edgar Allan Poe |
11-11-2001, 08:38 PM | #13 |
Very Mad Bird
Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 52
Posts: 9,246
|
quote: Thankyou my friend. [img]smile.gif[/img] |
11-11-2001, 09:06 PM | #14 |
Very Mad Bird
Join Date: January 7, 2001
Location: Breukelen (over the river from New Amsterdam)
Age: 52
Posts: 9,246
|
quote: [img]smile.gif[/img] I won't. I think we got off on the wrong foot mate. You walked into a thread that was the result of provocation (plenty of it unwitting), frustration and despair. Apparently we agree on matters metaphysical though mate. Oh, and I love Britain too. [img]smile.gif[/img] Believe it or not. |
11-11-2001, 10:56 PM | #15 |
Manshoon
Join Date: October 19, 2001
Posts: 157
|
It's highly unlikely bin shiten has nukes, first of all, it's unlikely he could get a nuke missle, let alone the technical equipment (computers, launchpads ect..) to lauch the missle. If he did have one it would be a something he'd have to get in by plane... And with the security as tight as it is I highly doubt a big metal container with a biohazard sticker on it would get anywhere near the US... Even so.. you can't buy a nuke at a corner store...
Chemical weapons I'm not so sure about, although I especially hope he doesn't have viral weapons (virus). One modified cold virus and you could make anthrax look like the flu in comparison... BTW... Don't get so scared about bin shiten.. he's a TERRORist..meaning he tries to scare people.. don't let him get to you.. Love from Canada.
__________________
<IMG SRC=\"ubb/noncgi/smiles/NeoOrog.gif\"> <BR> <BLOCKQUOTE><font size=\"1\" face=\"Verdana, Arial\">quote:</font><HR><font face=\"Verdana, Arial\" size=\"2\">\"Est Sularis Oth Mithas\"-->Honour Is My Life</font><HR></BLOCKQUOTE> |
11-11-2001, 11:19 PM | #16 |
Dungeon Master
Join Date: September 5, 2001
Location: Columbia, Missouri
Age: 63
Posts: 93
|
I don't think Bin Ladin has nukes either. I think he would have used them if he had, even if he did want to lead up to it with suicide planes against the WTC; the start of attacks against the Taliban would have been the perfect time to use them, from his standpoint. But he has not.
Unfortunately he doesn't need ICBM's or even planes to deliver them. Back in WWII when they were still figuring out how to build nukes in the first place and they thought they would be really big (in size), the original plan was to just sail the nuke into a harbor in a ship and set it off. There is no reason that wouldn't work now. Most cargo comes in those huge containers and many don't get opened by customs. But even if they all were, you could just set off the bomb before the ship gets to customs. As long as the ship is in port,,, |
11-12-2001, 02:31 AM | #17 |
Horus - Egyptian Sky God
Join Date: March 4, 2001
Location: either CA or MO
Age: 42
Posts: 2,674
|
quote: well, you have to realize that if the nuke is set off on ground, the damage will be significantly reduced as I learnt six years ago back in high school, there are two ways to launch a nuke depending on purposes. one is to drop the bomb from a plane, this way covers widest area and kills most of the ground targets. the second is to drop the nuke and set it off close to the ground, the explosion would destroy bunkers and underground units but covers significantly smaller areas I learnt this six years ago, so the technology may be much different back then. |
11-12-2001, 05:04 AM | #18 |
Avatar
Join Date: August 27, 2001
Location: Poznan, Poland
Posts: 575
|
Nuke and missile are quite separate things. For sure he has no missile able to carry nuclear weapon across ocean. I dont know if he has usable nuclear head, I believe he would already use it: in response for american attacks in Afghanistan, presence in Saudi Arabia.
IMHO or how would I use nuclear head: small truck in centre of city and suicidal operator. Talking about missiles and planes is a big misunderstanding . Also biological and chemical weapons wont be used with missiles. Accurate and long range missiles are very rare and expensive, only US, Russia and China can afford it. They are not pocket weapons. Continental ballistic missiles requires a lot of infrastructure. Iraqui SCUD missiles mounted on vehicles after adaptation had range 600 km. Korean test missiles have range more then 1000km. But accuracy! No country will risk to launch nuclear/chemical/biological missile against US or Israel because missile can be tracked - all countries will know who launched missile. |
11-12-2001, 04:08 PM | #19 |
Zartan
Join Date: March 11, 2001
Location: North Carolina USA
Age: 57
Posts: 5,177
|
I do not believe he has one because I don't believe he would "tip his hand" by admitting it. If he did have one, the only reason for not using it, up to this point, would be as Ryanamur stated to wait for something big.
I don't believe he would wait too long.
__________________
[img]\"http://home.carolina.rr.com/orthanc/pics/Spinning%20Hammer%20Sig%20Pic.gif\" alt=\" - \" /> |
11-12-2001, 06:17 PM | #20 |
Fzoul Chembryl
Join Date: March 29, 2001
Location: Montréal, Canada
Age: 49
Posts: 1,763
|
Just a small addition. Two Pakistanis nuclear researchers admited to have met with Al-Queda members in Afghanistan. That was on CNN this morning.
Up 'til now, the Bush Administration said they had no reports of possible nukes in Al-Queda's hands... this could prove to be one such report. BTW: Please everyone, don't be scared about Bin having nukes. Just live life as it's meant to be lived: have fun!
__________________
An idiot will only play Russian roulette with an automatic pistol! Thank God they only do it once! <img border=\"0\" title=\"\" alt=\"[Smile]\" src=\"smile.gif\" /> |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Would The World Be Better Off Without Nukes? | Lavindathar | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 43 | 01-10-2003 02:52 AM |
If war leads to nukes, then what?! | Black Dragon | General Discussion | 42 | 01-09-2003 04:56 PM |
What About Nukes and North Korea? | skywalker | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 25 | 10-18-2002 05:57 PM |
More unlikely advertising claims ... | Pangur Ban | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 4 | 10-02-2002 09:35 PM |
Nukes? | skywalker | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 24 | 03-14-2002 04:34 AM |