09-12-2002, 02:12 PM | #11 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Although, if the process of sterilization made you walk the walk, you may have a case for a malpractice suit...[/QB][/QUOTE] LOL hehe As for replacing myself, that is the function of all living organisms. I contributed a 0 net gain, I could have gone forth and multiplied as my religion dictates |
|
09-12-2002, 03:30 PM | #12 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
Although, if the process of sterilization made you walk the walk, you may have a case for a malpractice suit...[/QUOTE] LOL hehe As for replacing myself, that is the function of all living organisms. I contributed a 0 net gain, I could have gone forth and multiplied as my religion dictates [/QB][/QUOTE]So if you were an amoeba, would you go forth and divide? Would a Borg go forth and integrate? Back on topic, I think any issues as far-reaching as global warming, and other potentially adverse ecological problems should be approached with caution foremost. To misquote Shakespeare, "The ecosystem is not only more complex than we imagine, it's more complex than we can imagine" I think it would be better to find in thirty years that we had spent effort on cleaning up our planet that may not have been necessary for survival rather than discover that we didn't spend effort when we should have. For example, if the degeneration of the biosphere proceeds geometrically, we may be alright, but if we assume that, only to find later that it's a logarithmic process, we're going to be very sorry. |
|
09-12-2002, 03:36 PM | #13 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Which is exactly why I advocate technology and explorations into newer and more efficient sources of power, on cleaner technology and all of that, I just don't go along with the alarmist, sensationalism that is so prevelant in the media. It can be done in a calm and affordable rational way.....it has been going on...cars are cleaner now than ever, our factories are cleaner our goals are for cleaner.....we do not have to wreck our society to get there is my message. [img]smile.gif[/img]
You know, I am from Pennsylvania, and I still have vivid memories of going to Pittsburgh to see a Steelers game....I remember all the buildings being covered with soot, I remember the haze in the air, and the smell of the steel mills (and the background roaring)...if you go to Pittsburgh today, you see clean buildings, no haze in the air and it is not such a bad place to be. (yes they did close the steel mills eventually, but they have far more people there now with far more business and far more cars and yet it is also one of the cleanest cities) [ 09-12-2002, 03:39 PM: Message edited by: MagiK ] |
09-12-2002, 04:15 PM | #14 | |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Quote:
My concern with the questions we now face is that if insufficient economic return is seen, will we be able to stop or change in time to prevent lasting damage? In the early 70's would the more fuel-efficient and cleaner engines have even been developed if it weren't for the OPEC crisis? As you noted with environmental extremists, a change in the status quo toward cleaner technologies would not necessarily benefit those who make their money doing the research. Likewise, without the pressure to change, the companies who are making money with equipment and systems that are unclean will have no reason to do anything that would lessen their profits. It's certainly not a light issue, this state of our planet. |
|
09-12-2002, 04:33 PM | #15 |
Baaz Draconian
Join Date: September 8, 2002
Location: Cornelius,NC
Age: 36
Posts: 700
|
That brings up an interesting point. Don't listen to your Science teacher!! [img]tongue.gif[/img]
__________________
I am the Ferret king, master of the hordes, allied to Someguy\'s mighty pinguins, we will soon rule the world! |
09-12-2002, 05:36 PM | #16 |
John Locke
Join Date: February 7, 2002
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Age: 35
Posts: 8,985
|
You know, I heard an intriuging theory, a while back, that said that the suns changes in temperature could be the cause of ice ages, heat ages (thats what I call global warming). Its only a couple of degree's kelvin, but apparantly that makes an impact on our planet. I think this is the best theory.
|
09-12-2002, 05:51 PM | #17 | |
Manshoon
Join Date: July 15, 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Age: 49
Posts: 213
|
Quote:
__________________
[img]\"http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v381/AngAvs/avatar6517_2.jpg\" alt=\" - \" /><br />A Thinking Monkey told me. |
|
09-12-2002, 06:58 PM | #18 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
LOL Lox that was funny [img]smile.gif[/img]
As for the Sun, it is the single biggest factor for temperatures here on earth. Variations in solar output, changes in the density of dust and gas in the solar system also plays a part, for all we know the earth goes through a dust cloud every so often, it wouldnt have to be very dense, just enough to block a small percentage of incoming radiation. As someone mentioned onece, there are as many theories as there are people researching the problem. |
09-12-2002, 07:07 PM | #19 |
Elite Waterdeep Guard
Join Date: August 31, 2002
Location: The Netherlands
Age: 46
Posts: 26
|
this is my 2 cents
* human interference can't warm up the earth like that (except for nuclear holocaust etc.) * not so long ago we were in the Ice Age (few thousand years)... who knows what the concequences of that are... * the guys that discovered this whole gobal warmth stuff is now disclaiming it all ... The thing is that over time there has grown an entire industry (thousands of people working in that field) in this stuff ... Now that same guy that made all te newspapers with his idea's/findings is now being almost "silenced" ...
__________________
Do not blame others for making you mad..Anger is a choice ..choose wisely<br /><br /> |
09-12-2002, 10:41 PM | #20 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Yes there is quite a lot of political and professional fall out for anyone who dares to question the "Global Warming" crowd. They do NOT seem to want to allow anyone with discrepancies to report to be allowed to have a voice. It really is a case of intelectual barbarism.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
global warming stopped by cars | burnzey boi | General Discussion | 17 | 04-25-2005 03:00 PM |
Talk about global warming, eh? | Link | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 19 | 07-16-2004 12:25 PM |
Global Warming: Who's to blame? | Avatar | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 31 | 09-03-2003 10:50 AM |
Global Warming (time to stir the pot) | MagiK | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 22 | 05-16-2002 09:28 AM |
Global Warming! Please read and answer | Moridin | General Conversation Archives (11/2000 - 01/2005) | 51 | 04-11-2001 08:01 AM |